jRCT ロゴ

臨床研究等提出・公開システム

Top

English

臨床研究・治験計画情報の詳細情報です。(JMACCT)

保留
平成24年1月6日
平成26年11月25日
平成23年12月28日
Efficacy of Enamel Matrix Derivative/ Freeze-Dried Bone Allograft VS Enamel Matrix Derivative/ Demineralized Freeze-Dried Bone Allograft with or without Forced Eruption Treating Infrabony Defects: Two Randomized Trials
Efficacy of Enamel Matrix Derivative/ Freeze-Dried Bone Allograft VS Enamel Matrix Derivative/ Demineralized Freeze-Dried Bone Allograft with or without Forced Eruption Treating Infrabony Defects: Two Randomized Trials
荻原茂樹 
荻原歯科医院
To determine the efficacy of EMD/FDBA VS EMD/DFDBA with or without forced eruptionon changes in infrabony defects.
非該当
Chronoc periodontitis
その他
local dental society

総括報告書の概要

管理的事項

2012年01月06日

1 臨床研究の名称等

2 臨床研究結果の要約

2011年12月28日
/
/
/ Every intervention are safe. Every intervention are safe.
/ Both EF and ED therapies resulted in greater soft tissue improvement at 1 and 3 years follow-up compared with EMD alone. Both graft materials worked well in the managing of deep infrabony defects when combined with EMD.
This study showed that both forced eruption/EMD/FDBA and forced eruption/EMD/DFDBA combination therapies result in greater soft tissue improvements at 1- and 3- year follow-up in addition to greater hard tissue improvements at 6- months re-entry compared than forced eruption/EMD alone
Both EF and ED therapies resulted in greater soft tissue improvement at 1 and 3 years follow-up compared with EMD alone. Both graft materials worked well in the managing of deep infrabony defects when combined with EMD.
This study showed that both forced eruption/EMD/FDBA and forced eruption/EMD/DFDBA combination therapies result in greater soft tissue improvements at 1- and 3- year follow-up in addition to greater hard tissue improvements at 6- months re-entry compared than forced eruption/EMD alone
/ Both FDBA and DFDBA graft materials worked well in the managing of deep infrabony defects when combined with EMD.
This study showed that both forced eruption/EMD/FDBA and forced eruption/EMD/DFDBA combination therapies result in greater soft tissue improvements at 1- and 3- year follow-up in addition to greater hard tissue improvements at 6- months re-entry compared than forced eruption/EMD alone
Both FDBA and DFDBA graft materials worked well in the managing of deep infrabony defects when combined with EMD.
This study showed that both forced eruption/EMD/FDBA and forced eruption/EMD/DFDBA combination therapies result in greater soft tissue improvements at 1- and 3- year follow-up in addition to greater hard tissue improvements at 6- months re-entry compared than forced eruption/EMD alone
RCT RCT
公表されている Yes
初回出版日 / Date of First Publication
結果の開示先 / Results links Journal of Periodontology
結果の開示先 / Results links 20111228144835_Table 3' for trial 2..docx

3 IPDシェアリング

/
/

管理的事項

研究の種別 保留
登録日 2012年01月06日
jRCT番号 jRCT1090220077

1 臨床研究の実施体制に関する事項及び臨床研究を行う施設の構造設備に関する事項

(1)研究の名称

Efficacy of Enamel Matrix Derivative/ Freeze-Dried Bone Allograft VS Enamel Matrix Derivative/ Demineralized Freeze-Dried Bone Allograft with or without Forced Eruption Treating Infrabony Defects: Two Randomized Trials (RCT) Efficacy of Enamel Matrix Derivative/ Freeze-Dried Bone Allograft VS Enamel Matrix Derivative/ Demineralized Freeze-Dried Bone Allograft with or without Forced Eruption Treating Infrabony Defects: Two Randomized Trials (RCT)
Efficacy of Enamel Matrix Derivative/ Freeze-Dried Bone Allograft VS Enamel Matrix Derivative/ Demineralized Freeze-Dried Bone Allograft with or without Forced Eruption Treating Infrabony Defects: Two Randomized Trials Efficacy of Enamel Matrix Derivative/ Freeze-Dried Bone Allograft VS Enamel Matrix Derivative/ Demineralized Freeze-Dried Bone Allograft with or without Forced Eruption Treating Infrabony Defects: Two Randomized Trials

(2)研究責任医師(多施設共同研究の場合は、研究代表医師)に関する事項等

/ 荻原茂樹  Shigeki Ogihara DDS,Ph.D.
/ 荻原歯科医院 Ogihara Dental Clinic/ Periodontics &Implat Dentistry
/ Periodontics Periodontics
/ 足立区足立3-7-16 7-16, Adachi 3 chome, Adachi-ku, Tokyo
03-3849-8483
03-3849-7483
oshigeki@fantasy.plala.or.jp
荻原茂樹  Shigeki Ogihara DDS,Ph.D.
荻原歯科医院 Ogihara Dental Clinic/ Periodontics &Implat Dentistry
Periodontics Periodontics
足立区足立3-7-16 7-16, Adachi 3 chome, Adachi-ku, Tokyo
03-3849-8483
03-3849-7483
oshigeki@fantasy.plala.or.jp
Date of Approved 2003年11月28日

(3)研究責任医師以外の臨床研究に従事する者に関する事項

 
 
 
 
 
 
 

(4)多施設共同研究における研究責任医師に関する事項等

1
専門医療病院・医院 SPECIALTY CARE HOSPITAL or CLINIC
日本 Japan
東京都 Tokyo
/

 

/

 

 

2 臨床研究の目的及び内容並びにこれに用いる医薬品等の概要

(1)臨床研究の目的及び内容

Both FDBA and DFDBA graft materials worked well in the managing of deep infrabony defects when combined with EMD. This study showed that both forced eruption/EMD/FDBA and forced eruption/EMD/DFDBA combination therapies result in greater soft tissue improvements at 1- and 3- year follow-up in addition to greater hard tissue improvements at 6- months re-entry compared than forced eruption/EMD alone In trial 1:Both FDBA and DFDBA graft materials worked well in the managing of deep infrabony defects when combined with EMD. In trial 2:This study showed that both forced eruption/EMD/FDBA and forced eruption/EMD/DFDBA combination therapies result in greater soft tissue improvements at 1- and 3- year follow-up in addition to greater hard tissue improvements at 6- months re-entry compared than forced eruption/EMD alone
To determine the efficacy of EMD/FDBA VS EMD/DFDBA with or without forced eruptionon changes in infrabony defects. To determine the efficacy of EMD/FDBA VS EMD/DFDBA with or without forced eruptionon changes in infrabony defects.
非該当 N/A
2003年12月03日
2004年04月01日
2004年04月01日
2011年10月30日
2011年12月28日
2012年07月28日
2012年07月28日
2011年12月28日
69
観察研究 Observational
有効性 EFFICACY
Randomised pararell clinical trial Randomised pararell clinical trial
4
プラセボ対照 placebo control
単盲検 single blind
治療 treatment purpose
あり Yes
個人 INDIVIDUAL
なし No
なし No
なし No
その他 OTHER
/ 日本 Japan
6mm>CAL and radiographic bone loss 6mm>CAL and radiographic bone loss
1) systematic diseases influencing periodontal surgery; 2) systematic medications affecting periodontal status; 3) pregnancy or lactation; 4) smoker; 5) sensitivity to minocycline and tetracycline. 1) systematic diseases influencing periodontal surgery; 2) systematic medications affecting periodontal status; 3) pregnancy or lactation; 4) smoker; 5) sensitivity to minocycline and tetracycline.
歳 ヶ月 週 日 時間 下限なし Age Month Week Day Hour No limit
歳 ヶ月 週 日 時間 上限なし Age Month Week Day Hour No limit
男性・女性 Both
あり Yes
/ Chronoc periodontitis Chronoc periodontitis
/
いいえ No
なし No
/ 介入の種類:医薬品,手技
介入の名称:EMD alone vs EMD/FDBA vs EMD/DFDBA with or without forced eruption
医薬品の剤型/医療機器の一般的名称:非該当,その他
投与経路/適用部位:非該当,非該当
投与量/使用量:
投与回数/使用回数:
継続期間:4週間
投与レジメン:
治療群の詳細:EMD/FDBA, EMD/FDBA, Ortho/EMD/DFDBA, Ortho/EMD/FDBA
対照の名称:あり
医薬品の剤型/医療機器の一般的名称:その他
投与経路/適用部位:
投与量/使用量:none
投与回数/使用回数:
継続期間:
投与レジメン:
Intervention type:DRUG,PROCEDURE
Name of intervention:EMD alone vs EMD/FDBA vs EMD/DFDBA with or without forced eruption
Dose form / Japanese Medical Device Nomenclature:NOT APPLICABLE,OTHER
Route of administration / Site of application:NOT APPLICABLE,NOT APPLICABLE
Dose per administration:
Dosing frequency / Frequency of use:
Planned duration of intervention:4 weeks
Intended dose regimen:
detailes of teratment arms:EMD/FDBA, EMD/FDBA, Ortho/EMD/DFDBA, Ortho/EMD/FDBA
Comparative intervention name:EMD alone without graft material (negative control) with or without forced eruption
Dose form / Japanese Medical Device Nomenclature:OTHER
Route of administration / Site of application:
Dose per administration:none
Dosing frequency / Frequency of use:
Planned duration of intervention:
Intended dose regimen:
/
The primary outcome measurewas absolute change in PD reduction and CAL gain from baseline to 1-year and 3 years follow-up. The primary outcome measurewas absolute change in PD reduction and CAL gain from baseline to 1-year and 3 years follow-up.
1 year and 3 years follow-up 1 year and 3 years follow-up
The primary outcome measurewas absolute change in PD reduction and CAL gain from baseline to 1-yearand 3 years follow-up. The primary outcome measurewas absolute change in PD reduction and CAL gain from baseline to 1-year and 3 years follow-up.
OPAL gain OPAL gain from baseline to 6 month
6 months reentry surgery 6 months reentry surgery
OPAL gain OPAL gain from baseline to 6 month

(2)臨床研究に用いる医薬品等の概要

医薬品 DRUG

3 臨床研究の実施状況の確認に関する事項

(1)監査の実施予定

(2)臨床研究の進捗状況

その他 OTHER
試験終了 COMPLETED

4 臨床研究の対象者に健康被害が生じた場合の補償及び医療の提供に関する事項

5 臨床研究に用いる医薬品等の製造販売をし、又はしようとする医薬品等製造販売業者及びその特殊関係者の当該臨床研究に対する関与に関する事項等

(1)特定臨床研究に用いる医薬品等の医薬品等製造販売業者等からの研究資金等の提供等

Dr Shigeki Ogihara
Dr Shigeki Ogihara
なし
none

(2)臨床研究に用いる医薬品等の医薬品等製造販売業者等以外からの研究資金等の提供

No funding No funding

6 審査意見業務を行う認定臨床研究審査委員会の名称等

local dental society local dental society
承認 Yes

7 その他の事項

(1)臨床研究の対象者等への説明及び同意に関する事項

(2)他の臨床研究登録機関への登録

なし No
Nill Known
JMA-IIA00077

(3)臨床研究を実施するに当たって留意すべき事項

(5)全体を通しての補足事項等

添付書類(実施計画届出時の添付書類)

変更履歴.csv
ChangeTracking.csv

添付書類(終了時(総括報告書の概要提出時)の添付書類)

設定されていません

設定されていません

設定されていません

変更履歴

種別 公表日
終了 平成26年11月25日 (当画面) 変更内容
新規登録 平成24年1月6日 詳細